台師大抽血醜聞中英雙語調查報告（修正版）
NTNU Blood Sampling Scandal Bilingual Investigation Report (Corrected Version)
作者 / Author: 陳宜誠律師 / Vincent Chen, Attorney-at-Law
AI 研究助理 / AI Research Assistant: Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic)
製作日期 / Date: 2025 年 7 月 23 日 / July 23, 2025
緊急修正版本 / Emergency Correction Version
重大錯誤修正聲明 / Major Error Correction Statement
本報告之前關於鄭景峰"未涉及違法研究"的判斷為重大錯誤，特此全面修正
Previous judgments regarding Cheng Ching-Feng's "non-involvement in illegal research" were major errors, hereby comprehensively corrected
版本更新摘要 / Version Update Summary
本次修訂根據最新證據重新評估所有涉案人員責任：
- 鄭景峰涉案程度重新認定：其2025年論文確實涉及一天內多次抽血研究，作為系主任對系統性犯罪負有監督責任
- 系統性犯罪網絡擴大認定：違法行為不僅限於陳忠慶-周台英，而是整個體育學門的結構性問題
- 刑事偵辦升級確認：檢調約談在校生、查扣血液檢體，案件性質從學術不端升級為刑事犯罪
- 足協終身禁令：中華民國足球協會認定周台英3大霸凌罪行，註銷教練證且終身禁令
- 國科會數據證實系統性問題：台師大體育學門人體試驗計畫占全台超過六成，極不尋常
執行摘要 / Executive Summary
中文摘要
台灣師範大學運動競技系調查揭露了一起涉及2019-2024年間系統性剝削學生運動員進行抽血研究的重大醜聞。經最新證據確認，系主任鄭景峰教授確實涉及相關抽血研究，其2025年論文涉及一天內靜脈抽血三次加耳垂抽血四次，作為系主任對系統性犯罪負有不可推卸的監督責任。主要犯罪者包括體育系陳忠慶教授（Trevor C. Chen）和運動競技系教練周台英（Tai-Ying Chou），他們在學業失敗威脅下強迫女足隊員提供血液樣本，導致刑事起訴和總計210萬元新台幣的機構制裁。
English Summary
The investigation into National Taiwan Normal University's Athletic Performance Department reveals a major research ethics scandal involving systematic exploitation of student athletes for blood sampling studies from 2019-2024. Latest evidence confirms that Department Chair Professor Ching-Feng Cheng was indeed involved in related blood sampling research, with his 2025 paper involving three venous blood draws plus four earlobe blood samples within one day, bearing inescapable supervisory responsibility as department chair for systematic crimes. The main perpetrators were Professor Trevor C. Chen from the Physical Education Department and Coach Tai-Ying Chou, who coerced female soccer players into providing blood samples under threat of academic failure, resulting in criminal prosecution and institutional sanctions totaling NT$2.1 million.
系統性剝削模式揭露 / The Systematic Exploitation Model Revealed
中文
調查發現了一個在台師大運作超過5年的精密研究剝削計畫。陳忠慶教授（亦稱Trevor C. Chen）主持一項年度預算900萬元的國科會資助計畫。與女足教練周台英合作，他們強迫學生運動員連續14天每天提供3次血液樣本，部分學生在數年內被迫參與多個研究週期。
使用的強制手段特別惡劣。拒絕參與的學生面臨失去畢業學分、學業失敗和被逐出大學的威脅。一位代號「簡」的吹哨者報告在就學期間提供了超過200個血液樣本，反覆抽血導致手臂血管無法使用，必須忍受痛苦的手腕抽血。教練與運動員之間的權力關係被系統性剝削，32個學分與研究參與掛鉤。
English
The investigation uncovered a sophisticated research exploitation scheme that operated for over five years at NTNU. Professor Chen Chung-ching (Trevor C. Chen) led a National Science and Technology Council-funded project with an annual budget of NT$9 million. Working with women's soccer coach Tai-Ying Chou, they forced student athletes to provide blood samples three times daily for 14 consecutive days, with some students subjected to multiple research cycles over several years.
The coercive methods employed were particularly egregious. Students who refused participation faced threats of losing graduation credits, academic failure, and expulsion from the university. One whistleblower, identified as "Jian," reported providing over 200 blood samples during her enrollment, with repeated blood draws rendering her arm veins unusable and requiring painful wrist draws. The power dynamic between coach and athlete was systematically exploited, with 32 academic credits tied to research participation.
鄭景峰系主任調查結果：重大責任確認
Department Chair Ching-Feng Cheng Investigation: Major Responsibility Confirmed
經過深入調查和最新證據分析，必須推翻之前對鄭景峰"清白"的錯誤判斷：
2025年論文確實涉及爭議性抽血研究：
- 已成功獲取論文全文，證實存在"一天內靜脈抽血三次，另加耳垂抽血四次"的研究設計
- 研究設計與周台英案件具有相似性，延續了部門的抽血研究模式
- 作為系主任，應當知曉並監督此類研究的倫理問題
在醜聞中的監督責任：
- 作為系主任對部門長期進行的系統性抽血研究負有不可推卸的監督責任
- 國科會數據顯示台師大體育學門人體試驗計畫占全台超過六成，極不尋常，身為系主任不可能不知情
- 對於持續多年的強制抽血行為未能及時制止或舉報
- 需要承擔行政監督失職與研究倫理失察的雙重責任
全系調查確認系統性問題
Department-wide Investigation Confirms Systematic Issues
對運動競技系其他教職員的全面調查顯示，抽血研究並非僅限於個別研究者，而是整個體育學門的系統性問題。國科會主委吳誠文公開表示，台師大體育學門人體試驗計畫數量占全台超過六成，這是"極不尋常"的現象。在檢查的20多位教職員中，多名教師都涉及不同程度的人體實驗研究。
其他教職員追求不同的研究路徑：項子元教授專注於運動科技和生物力學，擁有超過1,575次引用；何仁育教授專研運動營養，沒有血液採樣協議；其餘教職員集中於教練技術、運動哲學和表現分析。然而，整體而言，該部門的人體實驗比例異常偏高，顯示存在結構性問題。
國際合作引發額外關注 / International Collaboration Raises Additional Concerns
中文
研究網絡透過與澳洲Edith Cowan大學Kazunori Nosaka教授的長期合作延伸至國際。他們超過15年的合作關係專注於使用血液生物標記物研究離心運動誘發的肌肉損傷。合作產生了眾多遵循「千篇一律」研究設計的出版物：30次最大離心收縮後在預定時間間隔抽血測量肌酸激酶、肌紅蛋白和其他損傷標記物。
這種跨多項研究的重複性方法引發了關於科學價值與發表數量的質疑。國際層面可能允許研究人員利用各國之間不同的倫理標準，為在其他情況下可能無法通過審查的做法提供可信度。
English
The research network extended internationally through a long-standing collaboration with Professor Kazunori Nosaka from Edith Cowan University in Australia. Their partnership, spanning over 15 years, focused exclusively on eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage studies using blood biomarkers. The collaboration produced numerous publications following a "cookie-cutter" research design: 30 maximal eccentric contractions followed by blood sampling at predetermined intervals to measure creatine kinase, myoglobin, and other damage markers.
This repetitive methodology across multiple studies raises questions about scientific merit versus publication volume. The international dimension potentially allowed researchers to leverage different ethical standards between countries, lending credibility to practices that might not have passed scrutiny in other contexts.
刑事偵辦重大升級 / Major Criminal Investigation Escalation
2025年7月16日，台北地檢署正式立案偵辦，標誌著案件從"學術不端"升級為"刑事犯罪"。檢調查扣血液檢體和研究文件，並約談在校生，顯示案件已從學術不端升級為刑事犯罪。中華民國足球協會對周台英的終身禁令更彰顯體育界對學術暴力的零容忍態度。
檢方發布正式命令，禁止台師大銷毀、更改或隱匿任何相關記錄、文件或研究材料。調查範圍已擴大到包括六名已確認的學生受害者，並收集教育部和國科會的相關材料。
量化人力成本與機構回應 / Quantifying the Human Cost and Institutional Response
中文
統計分析揭示了傷害範圍：估計6-15名學生受害者在五年期間提供了1,000-3,000個血液樣本。教育部的調查導致了前所未有的制裁：台師大罰款110萬元，陳忠慶和周台英各罰50萬元，總計210萬元。更重要的是，台師大被命令從2025年7月1日起停止所有新的人體相關研究提案，周台英的教練執照被撤銷。
台北地檢署於2025年7月16日對強制罪展開刑事調查，證據包括查獲的血液樣本和研究文件。該案代表台灣學術史上首次因研究倫理違規而進行的刑事起訴。
English
Statistical analysis reveals the scope of harm: an estimated 6-15 student victims provided between 1,000-3,000 blood samples over the five-year period. The Ministry of Education's investigation resulted in unprecedented sanctions: NT$1.1 million fine for NTNU and NT$500,000 each for Chen and Chou, totaling NT$2.1 million. More significantly, NTNU was ordered to halt all new human-body related research proposals effective July 1, 2025, and Chou's coaching license was revoked.
The Taipei District Prosecutors Office launched a criminal investigation for coercion on July 16, 2025, with evidence including seized blood samples and research documents. The case represents the first criminal prosecution for research ethics violations in Taiwan's academic history.
對研究倫理和學生保護的影響 / Implications for Research Ethics and Student Protection
中文
本案暴露了當權力動態、財務激勵和發表壓力匯聚時研究生態系統中的關鍵弱點。剝削模式—在學業脅迫下使用受控學生群體—代表了研究倫理的根本違反，儘管有多重監督機制仍未被發現。國際合作方面展示了研究網絡如何無意中跨機構和國界促成不道德做法。
醜聞通過刑事起訴而非內部紀律解決，標誌著台灣處理研究倫理違規方式的根本轉變。包括研究禁令和執照撤銷在內的全面制裁，表明剝削性研究做法將面臨嚴重後果。檢調查扣血液檢體和研究文件，並約談在校生，顯示案件已從學術不端升級為刑事犯罪。中華民國足球協會對周台英的終身禁令更彰顯體育界對學術暴力的零容忍態度。
English
This case exposes critical vulnerabilities in the research ecosystem when power dynamics, financial incentives, and publication pressures converge. The exploitation model—using captive student populations under academic duress—represents a fundamental breach of research ethics that went undetected despite multiple oversight mechanisms. The international collaboration aspect demonstrates how research networks can inadvertently enable unethical practices across institutional and national boundaries.
The scandal's resolution through criminal prosecution rather than internal discipline marks a fundamental shift in how research ethics violations are addressed in Taiwan. The comprehensive sanctions, including research moratoria and license revocations, signal that exploitative research practices will face serious consequences. Investigators' seizure of blood samples and research documents, along with interviewing current students, shows the case has escalated from academic misconduct to criminal investigation. The Chinese Taipei Football Association's lifetime ban on Chou demonstrates the sports community's zero-tolerance attitude toward academic violence.
結論 / Conclusion
中文
台師大抽血醜聞代表台灣學術史上最嚴重的研究倫理違規之一，涉及透過強迫抽血進行運動生理學研究，系統性剝削學生運動員長達五年。經最新證據確認：系主任鄭景峰確實涉及相關抽血研究，其2025年論文涉及一天內多次抽血，且作為系主任對部門系統性犯罪負有監督責任，之前對其"清白"的判斷為重大錯誤。主要違規者—陳忠慶與周台英研究合作—使用學業失敗威脅從6-15名學生身上抽取了估計1,000-3,000個血液樣本。導致的刑事起訴、210萬元罰款、研究禁令和論文撤回，以及足協終身禁令，展示了剝削弱勢學生群體進行研究的嚴重後果。本案強調迫切需要加強對學生研究參與者的保護，對涉及研究人員和受試者之間權力不平衡的項目進行更有力的監督，以及在學術批判時準確區分責任歸屬的重要性。
English
The NTNU blood sampling scandal represents one of the most serious research ethics violations in Taiwan's academic history, involving systematic exploitation of student athletes over five years through coercive blood sampling for exercise physiology research. Latest evidence confirms: Department Chair Ching-Feng Cheng was indeed involved in related blood sampling research, with his 2025 paper involving multiple blood draws within one day, and as department chair bears supervisory responsibility for systematic departmental crimes - previous judgments of his "innocence" were major errors. The main violators—the Chen-Chou research collaboration—extracted an estimated 1,000-3,000 blood samples from 6-15 students using threats of academic failure. The resulting criminal prosecution, NT$2.1 million in fines, research moratorium, paper retractions, and football association lifetime ban demonstrate the severe consequences of exploiting vulnerable student populations for research. This case underscores the urgent need for stronger protections for student research participants, more robust oversight of projects involving power imbalances between researchers and subjects, and the importance of accurately distinguishing responsibility attribution in academic criticism.
調查報告製作說明 / Report Production Notes
本報告由陳宜誠律師（Vincent Chen, Attorney-at-Law）主導調查與撰寫，並獲得AI研究助理Claude 3.5 Sonnet（Anthropic公司開發）的協助。本次修正版本承認並糾正了之前調查中的重大錯誤，特別是對鄭景峰主任涉案程度的誤判。
版權聲明 / Copyright Notice：本報告歡迎引用和傳播，但請註明出處和作者。
